PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.56%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.85%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.59%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.00%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.71%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.13%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 3.52%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
0.62%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-10.64%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.82%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.45%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.15%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.62%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.78%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.92%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.71%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.69%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-20.59%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-20.59%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.