PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.85%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
31.09%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
17.55%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.09%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.80%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.64%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
18.77%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.49%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.27%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.71%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.99%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.12%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.82%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.26%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.71%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.04%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.68%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
14.29%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.28%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.28%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.