PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.14%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.82%
Cost growth less than half of PANW's 9.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
2.18%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.04%
Margin expansion below 50% of PANW's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.55%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.50%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
4.91%
Similar total costs growth to PANW's 5.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.71%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.39%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.91%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.10%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.13%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.12%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.60%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.54%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.67%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.50%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.44%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.44%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.