PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.88%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
-0.40%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
10.21%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
1.22%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.67%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
7.72%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.04%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.20%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.73%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
11.02%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
59.68%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.94%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.39%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
15.23%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.83%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-3.97%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.97%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.