PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.46%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-57.94%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.03%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PANW's 11.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
7.54%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
16.29%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.52%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.56%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.31%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.46%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.60%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.53%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.09%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.37%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.58%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.26%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.62%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
6.62%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.