PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.27%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-8.49%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.81%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.53%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x PANW's 0.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
24.45%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 3.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.98%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.81%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.93%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.25%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.33%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.44%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.46%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.67%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.36%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.56%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.55%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.