PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.77%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-9.28%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.27%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x PANW's 0.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-4.64%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.19%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.60%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.50%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.97%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.36%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.42%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-14.00%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.84%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.92%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.33%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.27%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.