PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
19.70%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
24.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
19.42%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.23%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.44%
Similar R&D growth to PANW's 1.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.28%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 3.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.56%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36.82%
Similar EBITDA growth to PANW's 48.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
17.57%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 33.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
45.05%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PANW's 62.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
21.18%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-40.68%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.61%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.47%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.60%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
40.62%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.48%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.67%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.64%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
4.90%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.