PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.42%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-74.75%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.94%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.39%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.70%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.44%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.89%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.85%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.63%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.33%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-578.72%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-26.08%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.01%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.27%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.28%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.36%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-35.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.02%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.