503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.54%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 10.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
76.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
14.04%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-0.43%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.58%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.86%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.98%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.74%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.25%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.54%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
147.56%
Similar other expenses growth to PANW's 157.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
47.25%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of PANW's 90.60%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.57%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
70.89%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.20%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.43%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.23%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.58%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.08%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.