503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.27%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-13.64%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
5.51%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.22%
Margin expansion 50-75% of PANW's 0.39%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.78%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.67%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.90%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.72%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.18%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.06%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.87%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.07%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.50%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.21%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.39%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.03%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.01%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.10%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.18%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.64%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.