PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.86%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PANW's 10.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
73.68%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.17%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.65%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
19.10%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.89%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.18%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.11%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.59%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.72%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.21%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.73%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.11%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.53%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1.50%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.32%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.74%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.