PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.96%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
612.12%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-5.24%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.72%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.06%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.20%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.88%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
4.15%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.61%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.16%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
155.15%
Similar other expenses growth to PANW's 157.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
19.88%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.21%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.18%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
24.02%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.17%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.43%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
23.08%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.