PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.90%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
30.00%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
23.13%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.62%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.17%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.82%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.87%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.12%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.41%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PANW's 48.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
15.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
32.04%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PANW's 62.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.57%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-28.27%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
21.89%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
30.24%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.83%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.65%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.50%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.39%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.52%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.