PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.55%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.98%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-11.76%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.24%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.40%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.31%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.73%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-18.39%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.09%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.88%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.29%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
138.08%
Similar other expenses growth to PANW's 157.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
-3.34%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.28%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.37%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.33%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.29%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.14%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.