PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
42.00%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
123.27%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
30.95%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-7.78%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
76.92%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.87%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
50.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
213.92%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.64%
Similar EBITDA growth to PANW's 48.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
27.59%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to PANW's 33.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
32.65%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PANW's 62.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-6.59%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-40.19%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
14.89%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-19.10%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.92%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
14.87%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-19.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
15.79%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.