PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.49%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-70.11%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.29%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
14.79%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-22.85%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.75%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.25%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.44%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-9.26%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.94%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.71%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.27%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.49%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-2.01%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.76%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.81%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.59%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.57%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.11%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.