PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.65%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.18%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.46%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.15%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.08%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 3.52%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
-5.86%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
185.62%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.53%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PANW's 48.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
78.43%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 33.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.63%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.33%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.19%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.51%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.20%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.33%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.82%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.09%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
2.55%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.56%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.