PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.10%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-48.51%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
10.64%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
16.58%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-25.73%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.02%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-12.82%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.10%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.98%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.31%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.96%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
61.93%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
1825.51%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 90.60%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1928.92%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 72.01%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1730.30%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 598.35%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
1873.85%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1979.85%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2300.00%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2300.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.33%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.