PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
26.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
74.66%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
18.22%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.45%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.06%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.11%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
51.75%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.35%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.48%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.93%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.39%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
151.09%
Similar other expenses growth to PANW's 157.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
77.90%
Similar pre-tax income growth to PANW's 90.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
40.79%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 72.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
77.81%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
77.94%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
40.82%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.06%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.