PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.41%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.65%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.60%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.86%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2.11%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 1.82%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.96%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.45%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.83%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
11.83%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.09%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
24.03%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 46.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.09%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.93%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.14%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.93%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.93%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
28.14%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.37%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.15%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.