PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.11%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.94%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.60%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.49%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x PANW's 0.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.07%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.99%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
10.95%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
142.57%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.97%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
37.21%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to PANW's 33.87%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-12.86%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.95%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-186.68%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.29%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.35%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-44.25%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.30%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.36%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-44.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-48.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.01%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.