PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.86%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
19.55%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-1.35%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.15%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.58%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.59%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-13.71%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.51%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
30.43%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PANW's 48.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.68%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
43.55%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PANW's 62.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
40.93%
Similar operating margin growth to PANW's 46.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
11.72%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.07%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.58%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
36.05%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
36.07%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.43%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.43%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.37%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.