PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.11%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.13%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.35%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.77%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-6.69%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.29%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.53%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.64%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 33.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
11.52%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.77%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-51.14%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.86%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.00%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.78%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-6.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.45%
Share count reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.65%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.38%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.