PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth 50-75% of PANW's 10.80%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.45%
Cost growth less than half of PANW's 9.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
5.98%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PANW's 11.24%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
0.34%
Similar margin change to PANW's 0.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
12.14%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.92%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
14.00%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.43%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.21%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.99%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
75.81%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
0.94%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.43%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-87.24%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.36%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.68%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.67%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
47.83%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.99%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.00%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.