PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.13%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-11.13%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-3.01%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.18%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-10.41%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.91%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.59%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
35.36%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PANW's 48.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
64.92%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 33.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
35.36%
Operating income growth 50-75% of PANW's 62.43%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
41.20%
Similar operating margin growth to PANW's 46.59%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-41.97%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
17.90%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.98%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
776.40%
Tax expense growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 598.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize strategy.
-15.11%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.71%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.49%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.