PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
21.52%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
78.69%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
13.08%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.95%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.02%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-32.69%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
38.25%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.23%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.08%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.28%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.10%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.88%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
15.10%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.28%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.14%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.85%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.13%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.17%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
16.30%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.69%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.24%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.27%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.24%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.