PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.92%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-9.42%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.56%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.38%
Similar margin change to PANW's 0.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
1.63%
Similar R&D growth to PANW's 1.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
52.04%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-12.16%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.87%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 3.52%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.34%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.51%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.40%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.51%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.34%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.04%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.00%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.84%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.14%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.43%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.10%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.