PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.29%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
5.03%
Cost growth 50-75% of PANW's 9.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
9.04%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.69%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.09%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.23%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
12.99%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.46%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.64%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.18%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.82%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.71%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.32%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.88%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.88%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-5.01%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.45%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.11%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.65%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.