PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.41%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.38%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.78%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.88%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-4.03%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.89%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.02%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.60%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.02%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.41%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 33.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
15.28%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.87%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 46.59%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
50.40%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
29.26%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.30%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.98%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.28%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.55%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.27%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.