PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.01%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 10.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
113.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-2.12%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-15.63%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.34%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.59%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
36.88%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.43%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
43.13%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.59%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.40%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.32%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.40%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.11%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.27%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.52%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.94%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.57%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.50%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-34.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-25.71%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.24%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.