PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.80%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 10.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
-40.88%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
37.39%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 11.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.68%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.90%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
20.76%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-2.10%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.02%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 3.52%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
-13.90%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.92%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
89.78%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 48.33%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
65.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 33.87%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
89.78%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 62.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
65.31%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 46.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
14.71%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
83.21%
Similar pre-tax income growth to PANW's 90.60%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
59.59%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to PANW's 72.01%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
73.45%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
87.59%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.40%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
88.89%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
92.31%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.83%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.