PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.13%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
51.26%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-17.33%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.98%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
11.31%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.40%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
20.14%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-39.46%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.23%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.46%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-34.81%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.77%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.55%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.92%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-38.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-33.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-37.25%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.26%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.86%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.