PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.93%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
32.45%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.67%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-2.74%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.61%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
48.47%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
29.76%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.71%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
26.03%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.57%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.51%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.77%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.92%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
13.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.72%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.65%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.75%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.70%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.11%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.20%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.