PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-11.69%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.04%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.89%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.43%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.39%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
7.96%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
119.61%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-6.99%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.73%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
1.61%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.60%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.97%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.97%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.97%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.97%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.29%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-29.47%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.03%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.56%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.58%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.79%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.