PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.57%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
14.00%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
8.63%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.85%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.28%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.24%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.08%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 5.35%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
42.71%
Similar EBITDA growth to PANW's 48.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
19.21%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 33.87%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
28.92%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.66%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-29.18%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.07%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.24%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
295.97%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-2.07%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.13%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.45%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.25%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.