PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.90%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.63%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.84%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.99%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.15%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.72%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.75%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.78%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.66%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.85%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.54%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.98%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-102.82%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.56%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.17%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.77%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.13%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.35%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.95%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.35%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.