PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.37%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
9.90%
Similar cost growth to PANW's 9.64%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
-4.14%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.81%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.19%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-47.03%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-12.59%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.25%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.40%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.14%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.73%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.66%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.42%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.97%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
82.58%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of PANW's 157.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
15.04%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
16.63%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.57%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
17.37%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.00%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.65%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.16%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.65%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.26%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of PANW's 0.23%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.