PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-23.76%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 10.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-24.06%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-23.68%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 11.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.09%
Margin expansion below 50% of PANW's 0.39%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-2.62%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-11.49%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.45%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.22%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.85%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-36.32%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 48.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.61%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.23%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 62.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.30%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.59%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.87%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 90.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.89%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 598.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-39.87%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.67%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.19%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.00%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.84%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.