PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.59%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 10.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
15.06%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.54%
Similar gross profit growth to PANW's 11.24%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.95%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.86%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.82%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-19.44%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
12.46%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.64%
Operating expenses growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
7.72%
Total costs growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize control.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.46%
D&A growth while PANW reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.02%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of PANW's 48.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.03%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.63%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.66%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-44.05%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 157.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.79%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.99%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.81%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.78%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.98%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.04%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.33%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.60%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.37%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.