PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.97%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 10.80%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.98%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 11.24%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.48%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x PANW's 0.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.55%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
1.08%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-22.10%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 4.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.66%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 3.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.66%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.34%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.31%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.63%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 33.87%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.00%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.84%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 46.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
21.28%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 157.80%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.02%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.86%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 72.01%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
20.85%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
19.74%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.59%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.15%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
21.57%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.15%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.67%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.