PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
23.20%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.80%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
53.97%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 9.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
15.81%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-6.00%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.39% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.50%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 1.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
0.75%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
36.32%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.09%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.52%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
29.84%
Total costs growth above 1.5x PANW's 5.35%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
60.00%
Interest expense growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.47%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
15.85%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 48.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.58%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 33.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
14.74%
Operating income growth below 50% of PANW's 62.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.87%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 46.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
191.23%
Other expenses growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 157.80%. Bill Ackman would demand expense justification.
17.52%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of PANW's 90.60%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.61%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 72.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.36%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 598.35%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
22.62%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
23.81%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.19%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.36%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.44%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 0.23% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.