PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.72%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 29.10%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-4.85%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 37.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
9.00%
Gross profit growth below 50% of PANW's 26.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.11%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.46%
R&D growth less than half of PANW's 28.29%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
1.64%
G&A growth while PANW reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
15.41%
Marketing expense growth less than half of PANW's 56.53%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.76%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 37.47%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.45%
Total costs growth less than half of PANW's 37.42%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.90%
Interest expense growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.31%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 138.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
24.40%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.31%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.09%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.25%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-53.16%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 22.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.88%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.79%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.88%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 64.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.27%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.20%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.90%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.48%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% while PANW is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
0.41%
Diluted share change of 0.41% while PANW is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.