PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.87%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 14.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.16%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 11.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.37%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 14.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.54%
Margin expansion 50-75% of PANW's 0.75%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-0.57%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 12.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.09%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 20.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-21.85%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 12.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-23.81%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 279.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-14.24%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 13.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-11.78%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 13.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.67%
Interest expense reduction while PANW shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.95%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 17.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.08%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 8.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.48%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 19.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
4.30%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.99%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 10.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
2.78%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 7840.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.28%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 3.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
11.97%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to PANW's 15.69%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-1.36%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
5.62%
Net income growth below 50% of PANW's 50.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.41%
Net margin growth below 50% of PANW's 56.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
EPS growth below 50% of PANW's 50.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.08%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of PANW's 50.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.07%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.09%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.05% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.