PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
32.33%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 10.05%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
61.75%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 10.94%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
21.02%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 9.74%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-8.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.69%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 21.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.27%
G&A growth less than half of PANW's 181.30%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is structural.
29.63%
Marketing expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 13.91%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-238.75%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
16.71%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 38.80%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
35.71%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x PANW's 31.83%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
14.41%
Interest expense growth less than half of PANW's 2200.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
32.18%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 25.11%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
10.04%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.81%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-222.97%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
22.94%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-7.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
13.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of PANW's 108.98%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
25.06%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-5.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
25.40%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
25.81%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.16%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.64% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.46%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.64% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.