PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.79%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 6.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-28.17%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.94%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 7.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.03%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-0.18%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 14.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-2.59%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-17.30%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 9.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
35.14%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 139.08%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-9.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-18.86%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
29.63%
Interest expense growth less than half of PANW's 65528.26%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-0.48%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 15.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-12.49%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.50%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of PANW's 351.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.49%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.17%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.32%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 326.63%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-11.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.12%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.74%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-13.69%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.72%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.92%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.82%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.50%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 2.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.33%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 2.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.