PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.09%
Similar revenue growth to PANW's 13.16%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
22.52%
Cost growth above 1.5x PANW's 10.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.42%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of PANW's 14.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.09%
Margin decline while PANW shows 0.74% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.29%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 25.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-4.69%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 42.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
15.75%
Similar marketing expense growth to PANW's 15.52%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry requirements.
-497.14%
Other expenses reduction while PANW shows 0.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
4.67%
Operating expenses growth less than half of PANW's 21.03%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
13.78%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PANW's 18.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
0.62%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of PANW's 0.91%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.51%
D&A growth 50-75% of PANW's 11.23%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
27.36%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
33.06%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.63%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.31%
Other expenses growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
33.14%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.70%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.53%
Tax expense growth while PANW reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.14%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.19%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
29.09%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.48%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.25%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.65%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.76% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.