PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-17.91%
Revenue decline while PANW shows 7.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-29.35%
Cost reduction while PANW shows 8.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.81%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 7.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.65%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.79%
Similar R&D growth to PANW's 3.28%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
-0.55%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-14.04%
Marketing expense reduction while PANW shows 6.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
87.08%
Other expenses growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.39%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 4.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-19.00%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 5.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.25%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 1.66%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-0.39%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 8.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.53%
EBITDA decline while PANW shows 6.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.99%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of PANW's 12.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-15.20%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 4.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.30%
Operating margin growth below 50% of PANW's 11.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-204.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.98%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 2.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.13%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of PANW's 9.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-22.90%
Tax expense reduction while PANW shows 601.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.98%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.58%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x PANW's 0.73%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-14.08%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-14.08%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.74%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.86% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.86% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.