PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of PANW's 15.91%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.33%
Cost growth less than half of PANW's 7.17%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.36%
Gross profit decline while PANW shows 19.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.76%
Margin decline while PANW shows 2.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.57%
R&D growth above 1.5x PANW's 3.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
14.12%
G&A growth 50-75% of PANW's 19.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
17.38%
Marketing expense growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 12.92%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize spending rationale.
20.41%
Other expenses growth less than half of PANW's 170.00%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.21%
Similar operating expenses growth to PANW's 11.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
7.71%
Total costs growth 50-75% of PANW's 10.34%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
1.47%
Interest expense growth less than half of PANW's 3.45%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
11.89%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x PANW's 8.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
6.04%
EBITDA growth below 50% of PANW's 19.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-13.03%
EBITDA margin decline while PANW shows 43.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.70%
Operating income decline while PANW shows 22.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-41.93%
Operating margin decline while PANW shows 33.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
208.10%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x PANW's 31.25%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-33.54%
Pre-tax income decline while PANW shows 23.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-33.81%
Pre-tax margin decline while PANW shows 33.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-82.42%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-16.88%
Net income decline while PANW shows 22.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.21%
Net margin decline while PANW shows 33.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
EPS decline while PANW shows 25.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.02%
Diluted EPS decline while PANW shows 25.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.70%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.25% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.