PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
503.87 - 512.55
344.79 - 555.45
23.62M / 20.39M (Avg.)
37.30 | 13.67
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.37%
Positive growth while PANW shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.69%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
11.47%
Positive growth while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.79%
Margin expansion while PANW shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.27%
R&D reduction while PANW shows 10.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-19.68%
G&A reduction while PANW shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
-19.51%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while PANW reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-12.74%
Operating expenses reduction while PANW shows 0.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.37%
Total costs reduction while PANW shows 0.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
26.67%
Interest expense change of 26.67% while PANW maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-4.92%
D&A reduction while PANW shows 12.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
52.28%
EBITDA growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
32.09%
EBITDA margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
118.02%
Operating income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.96%
Operating margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-58.05%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
103.97%
Pre-tax income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
91.75%
Pre-tax margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
415.56%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x PANW's 44.83%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
81.52%
Net income growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
70.64%
Net margin growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
82.50%
EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.62%
Diluted EPS growth while PANW declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while PANW shows 1.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while PANW shows 1.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.